Friday, May 1, 2009

But Think of the Children

Some Pajamas Media douche wants wingnuts to play dirty, just like the left does, with all of our porn. Indeed, ever since Tea Party day, some wingnuts have been boning up on the vocabulary of "porn," just to adequately understand how they're being mocked. Behold:

Are you sick of feeling like you need to familiarize yourself with porn terms just to understand what they’re saying about the tea parties on MSNBC or CNN? Then start filing obscenity complaints with the FCC. The left has never hesitated to use the government and the court system against its political opponents, so why should we?
Yes, please do this, and complain to the FCC about all the porn. That'll show us! Because the FCC will come and tell us to stop laughing at "teabagging" because porn is illegal now. Score!

Just one problem, though, and that is that I am now having to learn sexy medical terms? Apparently some joker attached an amendment to the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Bill saying that, OK, you can't be hating gay people, but we must reserve the following things as OK to discriminate against. And that's what Alcee Hastings read into the congressional record. Like such:

View more news videos at: http://www.nbcwashington.com/video.



FOR THE RECORD, among the things Hastings says the GOP wants to preserve as not belonging to "sexual orientation" are asphyxiphilia, apotomnophilia and autogynophilia, corophilia, exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism [French alert!] and toucherism. Are you sick of having to familiarize yourself with the DSM-IV to figure out what the fuck wingnuts are on about?

So, whatever, this amendment was some stupid stunt to remind us that we can not-hate gay people all we want, but eating shit is still not OK by us! Because you have to draw the line SOMEWHERE, by god, decency depends on it, if you're an asshole. Anyway, it's basically a given that whatever wingnuts are demonizing is basically what they spend all day doing, so you can imagine John Boehner toucherisming with Michelle Bachman, because that's what's happening now, obviousy.

0 comments: